AUSTRALIAN WILD-FIRE: SHOULD WE PRAY OR WORK ?

            AUSTRALIAN WILD-FIRE:
        SHOULD  WE PRAY  OR  WORK ?

                                    ~A WELL-WISHER :)

⧫ Intro’n :
Welcome to the real world!! So, are you in the second team, of actually getting into some work than just praying or empathizing ?
Then ,well,you’re at the right place .
So let’s start with the business. Yup,enough of  intros !

⧫What to expect here?
So here I am not going to motivate you to contribute to solutions to problems,
they can simply leave and as well,live peacefully!
And the ones who already are motivated enough and determined,
thanks a lot for coming here ,please take your seat to go through all the problems,
and get your hands dirty on the ones you can contribute to ^+^
Your contribution can be any of these:
➮(a) Make sure the proposed problem is realistic enough,that is,at least solvable 
even if you couldn’t come up with the solution.
➮(b) Once sure about the problem being solvable,try to come up with a solution.
➮(c) If you cannot solve it ,but believe  it can be solved , no harm !
Try to improvise the problem ,that is,make the problem easier 
For example: do some steps and then conclude if these XYZ things get done ,
then it will be solved.
In the process,you will be minimizing the effort of the guy who is going to solve it
 in reality,by getting his first few steps already done or easing out his problem.
➮(d)If you can prove, this X no. of problem is unrealistic ,just inform it and ask us to remove it .It will save time of people trying  to solve it,in vain.
➮(e) Come up with better/new problems or/and solutions  having ideas from the
 given ones .
                            Best of luck,cheerio!! 
[SEND YOUR THOUGHTS TO fightagainstfire2020@gmail.com
Do note the problem category,and the problem no. ]

 
⧫ Proposed problems : 

⤔ Categories :
➮(i)How to prevent the wild-fire
➮(ii)How to minimize the use of stuff getting used now to prevent wild-fire for a 
given extent of effect .
For example: methodologies how to spray out water from the copters so that they
 will need less water still have the same effect .
➮(iii) How to evacuate people and to make sure they are evacuated in a safe place .
➮(iii) How to do the damage control .
For example,how to make sure the soil in the burnt areas are still fertile enough 
if it’s a farming land,or whether anything needs to be done to soil so that once the 
disaster gets over the types of trees that grow there do get the proper environment to maintain as less damage in the surrounding environment ,or,
To be sure whatever measures we are taking won’t be doing a rather major damage to the environment in the long run,and if possible, to propose present measures to be taken to solve a problem ,as well,to suggest on how to tackle the side effects,if any,these present measures are going to have later .

⤔explicitly proposed problems  :

➮(1)If you Guys have noticed the distribution of the affected areas , although 
not all but a majority is close to the coasts .
So I was wondering if it is a blessing in disguise ?Can’t we use the sea water only
,though not in the well-known sense .
Rather in the following way :



(The latest wildfire map from MyFireWatch (as of 8:00 p.m. AEDT) shows that
 bushfires are out of control in the southeastern area of New South Wales. 
Google Maps
Source: https://www.newsweek.com/australia-wildfire-map-update-bushfires-
sydney-new-south-wales-1480207 )

Now the question is will it work?
If yes, will the digging hole cause any damage in the long run
 like overflooding the area thorough sea water,if yes,how to resist 
that to stay with the idea.
Can you improve the idea ,or propose how exactly this idea is going
 to be implemented ?


➮(2)
Is there any particular pattern of spraying we should consider to minimize 
the water usage without compromising on the net affect .
For example: three trees if close enough , instead of spraying on all these..
Spray on the centroid of the triangle made by these three .

(3)If a place is burning ,and full of burnt trees as well. It means it is dominant 
in CO_2. We also know it acts as a fire-extinguisher .Now,the obvious question is ,
can we anyhow isolate a place away from lives and bind it within some walls 
thrown from helicopters so that, the place gets a closed and all the CO_2 produced
 due to burning resists in further intensification of fire and thus stopping it to 
reach towards places with animals or humans ?

                                                                  .....to be continued

Comments